Singin’
In The Rain
a film by Gene Kelly and Stanley Donen released
through Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer in 1952

Don Lockwood, speaking on the occasion of his movie’s
premiere, declares that his motto is “dignity, always dignity.” By way of a witty flashback we see that the
official record of Don Lockwood’s life doesn’t conform with reality. But dignity is what Don Lockwood wants from
his life, and he finds it by the time of Singin’
In The Rain—not the movie we watch, but the one we can only imagine, the
movie he shares with his great love, Kathy Selden. The change she engenders makes possible a life
equal to his rhetoric.
This absolutely astonishing, effervescent,
delightful film is one of history’s most highly regarded. It is one that everybody who sees
enjoys. To most it’s just some great
musical numbers strung together by an amusing tale of Hollywood’s transition to
sound. But the songs, the dances, the
editing, the set design, the acting, the lighting, and a dozen more components
of the film are merely technical. The
story is what counts, and each facet of the production serves an excellent
story. A movie with a good story will
endure even if its technique has fallen from favor, while great technique can
never rescue a dumb story. A great story
always has a fighting chance to endure.
With Singin’ In The Rain we
have a straightforward and compelling story told with dazzling technique. Moreover, because the story is simple it can
be told in a complex way, which makes for even more fun.
A star of the Roaring Twenties, Don
Lockwood is being swallowed up by his on-screen alter ego. His every move is dictated by his studio, his
work is nothing but “dumb show,” and the public thinks he’s soon to marry his
loathsome leading lady. Don’s not very
honest and his pride is getting out of control.
But he’s still loyal to his childhood friend, Roscoe Brown. He’s embarrassed by their humble origins,
thinking that a polished lie, a tapestry of music academies and
apprenticeships, makes for a ‘dignified’ background more fitting for a
star. In his red carpet reminisces, Don
is actually revealing his truest desire—if he can’t find dignity, he’ll fake it
like a pro. But the trappings of stardom
can’t compensate for a character deficiency.
They just complicate it. And even
though he fools the public, he can’t fool himself.
As in many great stories, one day the
old routine is broken, and the protagonist is forced to take stock of his
life. Aspiring dramatist Kathy Selden
becomes the first woman to refuse the attentions of Don since Lina Lamont (of
all people). Kathy, like Don, wants
legitimacy. She is just as much a hack
as Don Lockwood (jumping out of cakes is hardly an exalted calling); she’s just
not as well known. And Kathy, like Don,
portrays herself as something she’s not—she says she’s a legitimate actress on
the stage. So it’s no wonder he’s crazy
about her—she’s pretty, talented, delusional, and gives him the thrill of the
chase. Later we learn a lot more about
Kathy—she is selfless, happy to dub Lina in order to save The Dueling Cavalier and, by extension, Don’s career. Thus, Lina Lamont, who seemed but a dumb
rival for Don’s affections, is revealed to be a shrewd and ruthless opponent of
studio head R.F. Simpson: If Kathy
Selden doesn’t continue to dub for her, she’ll sue for the whole studio. So, at last, a villain(ess) emerges, and our
film’s fractured love triangle is reconstituted as a staging ground for power
plays. The climax— R.F. (appropriately
taking the lead), Don, and Roscoe pulling up the curtain to expose the source
of Lina’s new voice, and by so doing, reconciling the business machinations story
line with the Don, Lina, and Kathy love triangle—is eminently satisfying.
The climax underscores a strength of
the story—economy of character. No
player is extraneous. Take R.F. for
example. Through the picture he is just
a facilitator for jokes (tugging Lina’s microphone chord so she topples over,
dismissing talking pictures at his party and then later claiming he warned
everybody they were a threat). But once
Lina puts up a fight, threatening to take the studio away from him, R.F. turns
a corner. Confronted with the
blockbuster results of The Dancing
Cavalier’s premiere, he struggles.
He wants to do the right thing by Kathy Selden, but the easier way is to
collaborate with Lina and make a fortune.
So the cipher now has weight.
Indeed, no major character except for Roscoe Brown is exclusively
comic. But he is so funny that any
concerns for dramatic weight evaporate.
Roscoe (sounds like Rascal) stands apart, commenting on the absurdity of
the movie like an impertinent court jester.
He, like every character, has a specific purpose in the screenplay. There are no wasted lines or scenes.
Singin’
In The Rain is brilliantly constructed.
Consider its structure and patterns of repetition:
It begins with an abstract pre-title sequence presaging the celebrated hyper-reality
of The Broadway Melody. After the titles
we arrive at the premiere of The Royal
Rascal, while our film ends at a premiere (with a sneak preview sitting
right in the middle). The film opens
with the slicker-strut, and ends with, first, the film’s climax (where “Singin’
In The Rain” is performed), then concludes with a billboard announcing ‘Singin’
In The Rain’ as the title for a new Monumental Picture. (And just as the love story angle and movie
business angle were synthesized in the climax, Don and Kathy’s personal
partnership now doubles as a business partnership.) Of course, Gene Kelly’s iconic performance of
“Singin’ In The Rain” concludes our film’s second act.
Consider the sequencing of the songs
amongst the leads. “Make ‘Em Laugh” is
just Roscoe; “You Were Meant For Me” is Don (with Kathy watching); “Moses
Supposes” is Roscoe and Don; “Good Morning” is Roscoe, Don, and Kathy; then
after “Singin’ In The Rain” comes “I Would, Would You” by Kathy (with Don
taking a turn watching). Additionally,
we have the progression from Roscoe and Don’s formative years montage (all
realistic) to the montage compressing Hollywood’s conversion to sound
(realistic and abstract, leading to a concrete “Beautiful Girl” number) to The
Broadway Melody (all abstract, to be made concrete in The Dancing Cavalier).
That’s some kind of symmetry.
The Broadway Melody is a far more
interesting spin on an idea conceived for the ballet fantasy of An American In Paris. Here, instead of Gene Kelly dancing with his
female lead, he dances with a woman his character will not win over—that
enigmatic provocateur, Cyd Charisse.
Since this sequence is presented as what will be seen in The Dancing Cavalier, our imaginations
are not unduly taxed as they were by An
American In Paris. (We don’t have to
struggle with a justification for how this could happen.) Nor does the story grind to a halt like it
did in that film—after all, conceiving and shooting The Dueling Cavalier is the crux of our movie’s second half. But just like in An American In Paris, this extended dance sequence is a visual
expression of the protagonist’s longings.
The ‘hoofer’ goes from wide-eyed fish-out-of-water to
the-talk-of-the-town. And as he finds
respectability he loses his joy. But
then a new talent reprises the mantra The Hoofer hasn’t heard in a long
time—‘Gotta Dance.’ Interestingly, the
concept for this sequence (in the context of the movie) came from Roscoe. And Don acts it out. Like Roscoe, he lived it. Roscoe never became ‘dignified’ after
arriving in Hollywood, but Don lost the joy and exuberance that are Roscoe’s
trademarks. The flashback at the film’s
beginning implies that Don used to have the magic touch, but lost his passion
to entertain, fame beguiling his sensibilities.
The Broadway Melody is a jaw-dropping
excursion of and through cinematic imaginings, like a pioneering style of
alternate reality. And it’s the greatest
thing in the movie. Singin’ In The Rain is confirmed to be Don Lockwood’s story by The
Broadway Melody. It gives an account of
the movie in miniature. It is what makes
Singin’ In The Rain a
masterpiece. Here’s why it is special:
First, it’s a huge joke, because
there’s no way something like this could have been seen in a primitive talkie
circa 1927. (And—imagine—if The Dancing Cavalier’s costume sequences
are the dream of a modern-day hoofer then, since The Dancing Cavalier ends with a costume sequence, the hoofer never
wakes up!)
Second, talking pictures decimated
Broadway. Staging a tribute to Broadway
in a 1927 talkie is like awarding someone a medal before stabbing him with a
knife.
Third, this is accessible abstract
moviemaking. Too often we handcuff
movies—linear storytelling, concrete settings (either studio or location),
clear narrative direction. In The
Broadway Melody, we don’t know where we are—we know the sequence was filmed on
a stage, but we don’t know what reality it’s supposed to represent. (Remember, we’re not necessarily seeing a
verbatim excerpt from The Dancing
Cavalier.) The details of The
Broadway Melody’s story are subject to interpretation, and time has virtually
no meaning, so making sense of it all is an engrossing challenge. Let’s break it down bit by bit.
We start with an introduction sung by
Gene Kelly alone. Then The Hoofer
arrives in town. All he’s got is a
pocket full of dreams. Girls don’t pay
him any attention. But an agent decides
to take a bet, freshens up his style, and gives him his first gig. The crowd at that smoky dive is a lot like
him. Immediately he is embraced. He dances, giving a hint of his full talent
with a dash of The Windmill. But then he
meets an extraordinary woman—a gangster’s moll.
The Hoofer wants a girl, but she might prove more than he can
handle. They flirt and tease each other,
but before they can kiss, the gangster woos her back with diamonds. The Hoofer’s bewilderment is broken by the
agent, who sends him to work. Now, in a
brief montage, the hoofer’s rise is shown.
He climbs the ranks of Vaudeville, an ascension culminating in the famed
Follies of Ziegfield. Note that each gig
is a little more polished than the previous, and correspondingly less
exuberant. By the time he reaches the
Follies, The Hoofer is barely moving, let alone dancing. But he is a star.
Entering a posh club, everybody
cheers him. He has his pick of the
ladies, and all is well. But then he
sees his dream girl again. Even before
he goes over to speak with The Moll, he imagines what they could be
together. Now we, the audience, are
three levels deep into Singin’ In The
Rain. Even in this fantasy within a
fantasy, the exquisite structure of our film is evident. Three times—beginning, middle, and end—Cyd
Charisse’s mile-long scarf is set free after becoming tangled up with Gene
Kelly. She is no longer The Moll but
what The Hoofer wishes she could be—delicate instead of coarse, docile instead
of threatening, but still graceful, and loyal only to him. Where the first level has dialogue and
singing, and the second level has only singing, here, three levels deep, there
is no dialogue and no singing. This is
as abstract as the movie gets. Where,
before, their interplay was coy and challenging, here they are united in visual
harmony. It is she who walks over,
validating his hopes that she cares for him.
She allows herself to be lifted and cradled (where before he could only
grab at her.) And finally they
kiss. But their longing for each other,
expressed beautifully through movement, proves illusory; the dance ends with
the couple once more far apart.
Returning to the second level, we see The Hoofer approach her, full of
hope. But The Moll won’t give him a
chance. Even now, even with all that
money, he can’t have her.
Depressed, The Hoofer leaves the
Casino, calling to our memory an earlier scene when Don Lockwood stood
contemplating the just-departed Kathy Selden (after she caked Lina Lamont at
R.F.’s party). This time, any hint of
curiosity on his face, any vestige of hope, is gone. Alas, The Hoofer is alone.
Just then a young upstart catches his
attention, dressed like he was, long ago.
He sounds the same exuberant call—the one The Hoofer had forgotten, Gotta Dance. Remembering the joy of entertaining, and
reveling in the rediscovery of his proficient steps, The Hoofer throws off the
cares of the world and gets back to doing what he does best. And now he’s no longer alone—he dances with
others who, like him, celebrate the joy of living. Here, for the only time in the picture, Kelly
lets loose with his trademark windmill move. This is Gene Kelly at his best.
Even with the realization of a
long-hoped-for success, happiness is not guaranteed to follow. And, certainly, success is no guarantee of
love—women are easy, but love is hard. All
one has is the craft. Until The Upstart
arrives, this is the story of Don Lockwood before Kathy Selden—he struggled,
found success, became respectable, but found that none of it amounted to much
and certainly didn’t make him happy. The
Upstart represents Kathy Selden. He/She
inspires a change in The Hoofer/Don Lockwood.
And it is this change which finally makes our protagonist happy.
When he finally decides to risk being himself and not DON LOCKWOOD, when he realizes he’d rather be “flesh and blood” than a “shadow,” when he decides to love somebody besides himself, he finds the victory. To our film’s catalyst, Don says it best: “From now on there’s only one fan I’m worried about.” Kathy Selden has changed his life, helping him become the man he always aspired to be. In the end he found love and fame. But without Kathy it wouldn’t have been long before he had neither. She recognized his potential, both professionally and personally. What she saw missing in him, what he hoped others would see in him, he can finally see for himself, in himself—dignity. And he’ll never have to worry about losing it again.